Reading the Top Line: The Five Stand-Out Plays
The top of the table is dominated by two themes: logistics corridors and big-city consumption.
- Basra – Industrial & Logistics (score ~3.4/5)
- Baghdad – Industrial & Logistics (~3.2/5)
- Baghdad – Prime & Grocery-anchored Retail (~3.1/5)
- Basra – Retail (~3.1/5)
- Baghdad – Mid-income Residential (~2.9/5)
If you’re used to thinking “Baghdad first, everything else later”, Basra topping the list may surprise you. Likewise, if you assumed residential would dominate, it’s notable that logistics and retail outrank housing on risk-adjusted terms.
Let’s unpack why.
Basra: High-Beta Logistics, Not a Sleepy Yield Play
Basra’s industrial & logistics score is driven by one blunt fact: throughput. In 2025H1, ports at Umm Qasr North/South, Khor Al-Zubair, and Abu Flous handled 22.4 million tons of cargo and over 1,500 ships. That volume underpins everything from container yards and bonded warehouses to fuel storage, fabrication yards, and cold-chain facilities.
From a yield perspective, this is where you can still reasonably target double-digit IRRs and spreads well above local funding costs – if you price the volatility correctly. The catch is that Basra’s cash flows are acutely exposed to:
- Oil prices and export policy – fewer barrels, fewer ships.
- USD liquidity and sanctions risk – ports are dollar-denominated machines.
- Execution risk – industrial zones and logistics parks still rely on patchy power, water, and road infrastructure.
So if you’re developing in this sector, you should see Basra logistics as a cyclical trade rather than a bond proxy. Structure deals with:
- Shorter lease-up assumptions, but higher reversion potential.
- Conservative leverage, knowing that interest cover can swing quickly.
- Heavy emphasis on covenant quality (oil majors, Tier-1 logistics, large FMCGs).
When you look at the scorecard, that 3.4 isn’t saying “safe”. It’s saying “rich upside for professional risk takers”.
Baghdad: The Inland Engine – Logistics Plus Everyday Spend
Baghdad scores just behind Basra in Industrial & Logistics, but for different reasons.
Baghdad doesn’t have a port. What it has is scale: roughly 8–9 million people in the metro area, generating about 40% of Iraq’s GDP. Everything that moves through Basra’s ports is ultimately trying to reach someone’s shelf, warehouse, or doorstep in cities like Baghdad.
If you’re underwriting logistics here, your thesis is less about oil cycles and more about urban consumption and distribution efficiency:
- Last-mile and penultimate-mile depots feeding dense residential districts.
- Cross-dock and fulfilment facilities for e-commerce, FMCG, and pharma.
- Temperature-controlled nodes tying into imported food and health supply chains.
Rents for modern warehouse product remain thinly benchmarked, but you can think in terms of steady absorption and mid-single-digit rental growth in IQD, versus high-single-digit growth potential in Basra. On the yield side, the spread over local funding remains attractive, but it feels more like a core-plus play than a pure opportunistic one.
Baghdad’s retail story rhymes with that. Prime malls and high-street corridors in Al-Mansour, Jadriyah, Karrada, and Palestine Street show tight occupancy and waiting lists in anchor categories such as grocery, telecom, and F&B. With inflation near zero and housing and utilities still rising around 3.1% a year, real consumer incomes are stabilising rather than eroding. For necessity retail and well-positioned community centres, which support:
- Stable to slightly rising rents in IQD.
- Low structural vacancy, especially for units with parking and power resilience.
- Solid footfall that is less sensitive to tourism shocks than in pure leisure markets.
If you’re a retail owner, your job for the next 12 months is to protect NOI – index leases where you can, lock in strong anchors, and clean up weak specialty tenants before e-commerce takes more share.
The Housing Paradox: Shortage Everywhere, Investable Only in Pockets
At first glance, Iraq’s housing story looks like a gold rush. Official and advisory estimates suggest a national shortage of roughly 2.5–3.0 million units, and the government’s one-million-unit programme with ten new cities has made global headlines.
Yet in the scorecard, only Baghdad mid-income residential cracks the top five, and even there, the score is a modest 2.9.
Why?
Because when you dive into the data, you find that supply is neither where it is needed most, nor arriving at the pace implied by PR:
- Bismayah New City in Baghdad plans 100,080 units; about 30,000 have been built, and roughly 20–21,000 have been handed over by late 2024. The balance depends on timely payments and a newly restructured contract.
- Al Basra New City and Palm City in Basra advertise a combined 220,000 units, but are still in infrastructure and first-phase mode.
- Investigative work on 46 residential complexes in Baghdad shows a pattern of licences, pre-sales, and partial construction – but not complete, timely handovers.
For you as an investor, that means the national “housing boom” is real only on paper. In practice:
- Mid-income schemes in Baghdad with infrastructure, realistic phase sizes, and ticket prices tied to local incomes can still achieve healthy absorption and robust IRRs.
- In Basra and secondary cities, the same shortage is present, but it is layered with oil-cycle risk and weaker institutional capacity – making returns much more binary.
You may be asking: “Should I chase the mega-cities?” The scorecard is effectively telling you, “not yet.” A more resilient strategy is to focus on smaller, serviced phases that piggyback on existing grids and roads, price below the US$1,500–2,000/m² band in Baghdad, and leave optionality for future densification.